Farm Subsidy information
Connecticut
Total Subsidies in Connecticut, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 291
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Connecticut totaled $15,235,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Woodhill, LLC | Hampton, CT 06247 | $127,329 |
22 | Valleyside Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $124,600 |
23 | Palmer Farm | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $123,414 |
24 | Shawn Mcgillicuddy Dba Square A Farm | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $123,248 |
25 | Fairholm Farm Inc | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $121,555 |
26 | Elm Knoll Farm Partners | East Canaan, CT 06024 | $118,918 |
27 | Sherman Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $103,381 |
28 | Oakridge Dairy LLC | Ellington, CT 06029 | $94,065 |
29 | Roaring Brook Farm LLC | Ellington, CT 06029 | $89,468 |
30 | Driftwood Fisheries Inc. | New London, CT 06320 | $86,383 |
31 | Byron Gallup | Voluntown, CT 06384 | $85,326 |
32 | Hillandale Farms Conn, LLC | Bozrah, CT 06334 | $84,396 |
33 | Steven V Snurkowski | Preston, CT 06365 | $82,456 |
34 | Elm Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $81,927 |
35 | William E Hastings Jr | Windsor, CT 06095 | $71,917 |
36 | Hillard Bloom Shellfish Inc | Norwalk, CT 06854 | $69,144 |
37 | Courville Services, LLC | Trumbull, CT 06611 | $68,325 |
38 | Clark W Woodmansee III | Preston, CT 06365 | $66,355 |
39 | Hastings Farm LLC | Suffield, CT 06078 | $65,062 |
40 | Kasheta Farms Inc | South Windsor, CT 06074 | $64,278 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”