Farm Subsidy information
Connecticut
Total Subsidies in Connecticut, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,959
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Connecticut totaled $205,596,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Maple Leaf Farm Inc | Hebron, CT 06248 | $610,364 |
42 | Robert P Nowak | Suffield, CT 06078 | $609,665 |
43 | Blue Hills Orchard Inc | Wallingford, CT 06492 | $595,963 |
44 | John A Markowski | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $591,245 |
45 | Robin A Chesmer | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $587,650 |
46 | Steven V Snurkowski | Preston, CT 06365 | $577,357 |
47 | Prides Corner Farms Inc | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $575,000 |
48 | Edward Markowski Jr | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $563,862 |
49 | Spruce Hill Farms | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $554,551 |
50 | Kasheta Farms Inc | South Windsor, CT 06074 | $554,372 |
51 | Lawrence P Pagano | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $551,901 |
52 | Sherman Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $537,628 |
53 | Raffia Farms Inc | Enfield, CT 06082 | $515,113 |
54 | Sanford C Cohen Cohen Farms | Ellington, CT 06029 | $508,443 |
55 | T & D Growers LLC | Cheshire, CT 06410 | $503,144 |
56 | Valentino Farms | North Haven, CT 06473 | $497,970 |
57 | Giuseppe Diglio | Northford, CT 06472 | $497,945 |
58 | Potter Brothers | Washington Depot, CT 06793 | $495,492 |
59 | Robert Markowski | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $490,127 |
60 | Northern Valley Farms Inc. | Granby, CT 06035 | $486,502 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”