Total Commodity Programs in Connecticut, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,494
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Connecticut totaled $84,920,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Clark W Woodmansee III | Preston, CT 06365 | $407,534 |
42 | Mapleleaf Farm Enterprises LLC | Hebron, CT 06248 | $402,471 |
43 | Blue Hills Orchard Inc | Wallingford, CT 06492 | $384,849 |
44 | Potter Brothers | Washington Depot, CT 06793 | $382,675 |
45 | Elm Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $376,005 |
46 | Sunnyside Farm L L C | Voluntown, CT 06384 | $372,122 |
47 | Kasheta Farms Inc | South Windsor, CT 06074 | $357,691 |
48 | Norman Hill Farm | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $354,676 |
49 | Gluck's Dairy Farm | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $353,442 |
50 | Blue Slope Farm Inc | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $345,327 |
51 | Kogut Nursery LLC | Meriden, CT 06450 | $343,178 |
52 | Green Growth Properties Inc | Wallingford, CT 06492 | $325,000 |
53 | Elm Knoll Farm | East Canaan, CT 06024 | $316,373 |
54 | Terry M Tanner | Warren, CT 06777 | $316,265 |
55 | J Defrancesco & Son Inc | Northford, CT 06472 | $313,298 |
56 | Sunset Hill Farm Inc | Canaan, CT 06018 | $313,026 |
57 | John Ennis | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $306,813 |
58 | Willard J Stearns & Sons Inc | Storrs Mansfield, CT 06268 | $297,538 |
59 | John J Osga Jr | Griswold, CT 06351 | $296,226 |
60 | Hastings Farm | Suffield, CT 06078 | $295,321 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”