Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Hartford County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 44
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Hartford County, Connecticut totaled $183,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard Crabb | Broad Brook, CT 06016 | $3,305 |
22 | Thomas E Baggott Jr | Broad Brook, CT 06016 | $3,144 |
23 | Dario E Scaglia | South Glastonbury, CT 06073 | $3,091 |
24 | Davetta M Curtiss | Suffield, CT 06078 | $3,000 |
25 | Paul A Grinvalsky | New Hartford, CT 06057 | $2,790 |
26 | David Fusiek | Suffield, CT 06078 | $2,616 |
27 | Thomas Fusiek | Suffield, CT 06078 | $2,614 |
28 | Leo A Grouten II | Farmington, CT 06032 | $2,513 |
29 | Dr Robert K Milkey | Granby, CT 06035 | $2,414 |
30 | Marcia Clark Pilch | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $2,169 |
31 | Kasheta Farms Inc | South Windsor, CT 06074 | $2,134 |
32 | Hastings Farm | Suffield, CT 06078 | $1,750 |
33 | Joanne Preli | South Glastonbury, CT 06073 | $1,691 |
34 | Edward Kamis Sr | South Glastonbury, CT 06073 | $1,214 |
35 | Merrilee Leonhardt | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $1,011 |
36 | William Garthwaite | Windsor, CT 06095 | $815 |
37 | Glastonbury Elks Lodge 2202 Bpoe | South Glastonbury, CT 06073 | $750 |
38 | Blacey J Futtner Jr | East Hartford, CT 06118 | $692 |
39 | Polek Farms | Enfield, CT 06082 | $600 |
40 | Deborah Coulter-fusiek | Suffield, CT 06078 | $490 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”