Farm Subsidy information
Hartford County, Connecticut
Total Subsidies in Hartford County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 432
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hartford County, Connecticut totaled $105,288,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | House Of Hayes LLC | North Granby, CT 06060 | $502,175 |
22 | Vincent Farms LLC | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $494,251 |
23 | Robert Markowski | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $490,127 |
24 | Gary Miller | Suffield, CT 06078 | $444,493 |
25 | Kyle A Groszyk | Enfield, CT 06082 | $429,073 |
26 | Thomas E Baggott Jr | Broad Brook, CT 06016 | $411,977 |
27 | James A Bloznalis | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $409,183 |
28 | Donald Wagner | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $405,355 |
29 | Christian Leaf LLC | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $384,583 |
30 | , | $376,585 | |
31 | Windsor Farms Inc - Peter Baggott | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $365,346 |
32 | Edward Markowski Sr | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $344,987 |
33 | Hastings Farm LLC | Suffield, CT 06078 | $340,189 |
34 | Polek Brothers Tobacco LLC | Somers, CT 06071 | $338,710 |
35 | Dingess Farm | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $337,001 |
36 | William E Hastings Jr | Windsor, CT 06095 | $332,418 |
37 | Sheldon Mel Farm Gp | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $308,960 |
38 | Hastings Farm | Suffield, CT 06078 | $305,334 |
39 | Daniel J Beneski | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $299,627 |
40 | J Foster Farm LLC | South Windsor, CT 06074 | $298,591 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”