Loan Deficiency in Hartford County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 43
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Hartford County, Connecticut totaled $431,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Henri D Ducharme | Bloomfield, CT 06002 | $4,349 |
22 | Eric H Ducharme | Granby, CT 06035 | $4,349 |
23 | Pinecroft Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $4,319 |
24 | Logue Farms Inc | Woodbury, CT 06798 | $3,704 |
25 | Leo A Grouten II | Farmington, CT 06032 | $3,565 |
26 | Tulmeadow Farm Inc | West Simsbury, CT 06092 | $2,991 |
27 | Copper Rock Farms | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $2,868 |
28 | Pinecroft Farms | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $2,673 |
29 | Thomas Fusiek | Suffield, CT 06078 | $2,260 |
30 | James Brewster | Hampton, CT 06247 | $1,772 |
31 | Adelbert T Chmiel | Suffield, CT 06078 | $1,664 |
32 | David Fusiek | Suffield, CT 06078 | $1,631 |
33 | Peter J Otkowski Jr | Bloomfield, CT 06002 | $1,582 |
34 | White Eagle Transportation Inc | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $1,493 |
35 | Gale Farms Dairy Gp | Ellington, CT 06029 | $1,403 |
36 | Duane Thibodeau | Granby, CT 06035 | $1,244 |
37 | Munson Brothers | Kensington, CT 06037 | $1,238 |
38 | Glenn A Neilson | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $643 |
39 | Gottier Farms | Amsterdam, NY 12010 | $614 |
40 | Wade's Vegetables | Bloomfield, CT 06002 | $546 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”