Farm Subsidy information
Hartford County, Connecticut
Total Subsidies in Hartford County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 432
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hartford County, Connecticut totaled $105,288,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Desmond Samuda | Hartford, CT 06112 | $283,455 |
42 | Beneski Farms LLC | Suffield, CT 06078 | $275,328 |
43 | James V Horanzy | West Suffield, CT 06093 | $269,071 |
44 | Blacey J Futtner Jr | East Hartford, CT 06118 | $265,024 |
45 | Mary K Collins | Rocky Hill, CT 06067 | $259,264 |
46 | Ag Enterprises LLC | Granby, CT 06035 | $256,150 |
47 | , | $250,000 | |
48 | , | $250,000 | |
49 | John Dingess | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $245,501 |
50 | Fair Weather Acres | Rocky Hill, CT 06067 | $238,180 |
51 | Garden's Dream Farm LLC | Somersville, CT 06072 | $229,998 |
52 | Collins Powder Hill Farm | Enfield, CT 06082 | $229,930 |
53 | Robert C Hinckley Jr | Westfield, MA 01085 | $216,761 |
54 | Andre J Groszyk | Enfield, CT 06082 | $215,754 |
55 | Rosedale Farms Of West Hartford I | Simsbury, CT 06070 | $214,556 |
56 | Horton Farm | South Glastonbury, CT 06073 | $212,113 |
57 | Benjamin J Bielonko II | Suffield, CT 06078 | $208,256 |
58 | , | $207,916 | |
59 | Sadie Dingess | East Windsor, CT 06088 | $203,600 |
60 | Paul Cavanna | South Glastonbury, CT 06073 | $202,855 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”