Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Litchfield County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 82
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Litchfield County, Connecticut totaled $247,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ginni Dodd | Woodbury, CT 06798 | $531 |
62 | Joan A Lamothe | Falls Village, CT 06031 | $527 |
63 | Thomas R Coolidge | Falls Village, CT 06031 | $508 |
64 | John T Breakell | Goshen, CT 06756 | $450 |
65 | Joseph M South | Bethlehem, CT 06751 | $414 |
66 | Gordon Atwood | Thomaston, CT 06787 | $338 |
67 | Karen Kalenauskas | Watertown, CT 06795 | $324 |
68 | Thomas W Zagurski | Terryville, CT 06786 | $315 |
69 | Walter R Whitbeck | Winsted, CT 06098 | $308 |
70 | Caroline Chase | South Kent, CT 06785 | $291 |
71 | Wayne Woodard | New Milford, CT 06776 | $276 |
72 | Howard E Rood Sr | New Hartford, CT 06057 | $234 |
73 | Richard Kuss | Woodbury, CT 06798 | $188 |
74 | Frank J Hurrey | Torrington, CT 06790 | $164 |
75 | Daniel E Laplante | New Hartford, CT 06057 | $158 |
76 | White Ayr Farms | Washington Depot, CT 06794 | $157 |
77 | Robert Futh Jr | Washington Depot, CT 06794 | $140 |
78 | Willis E Ocain | Falls Village, CT 06031 | $81 |
79 | Raymond Kasulaitis | Barkhamsted, CT 06063 | $61 |
80 | Walter Burcroff | Goshen, CT 06756 | $59 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”