Total Commodity Programs in Litchfield County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 295
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Litchfield County, Connecticut totaled $15,041,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Thomas R Coolidge | Falls Village, CT 06031 | $70,704 |
| 42 | David Arno | Fort Ann, NY 12827 | $67,883 |
| 43 | Gresczyk Farms LLC | New Hartford, CT 06057 | $65,752 |
| 44 | Otto Von Ahn | Sharon, CT 06069 | $65,529 |
| 45 | George W Klug | Torrington, CT 06790 | $64,391 |
| 46 | Damiani Farm | Litchfield, CT 06759 | $63,472 |
| 47 | Walnut Grove Farm Inc | Watertown, CT 06795 | $61,003 |
| 48 | Fort Hill Farm LLC | New Milford, CT 06776 | $60,392 |
| 49 | Frederick Ralph Scoville II | West Cornwall, CT 06796 | $56,589 |
| 50 | Woodbury Sugar Shed Inc | Woodbury, CT 06798 | $52,003 |
| 51 | James S Young | Watertown, CT 06795 | $49,365 |
| 52 | Henry H Camp | Harwinton, CT 06791 | $46,016 |
| 53 | White Ayr Farms LLC | Washington Depot, CT 06794 | $45,493 |
| 54 | Est/charles J Flynn | New Milford, CT 06776 | $44,818 |
| 55 | March Farms | Bethlehem, CT 06751 | $41,401 |
| 56 | Thomas R Coolidge | Falls Village, CT 06031 | $41,091 |
| 57 | Michael J Horgan | Bantam, CT 06750 | $39,984 |
| 58 | Still Hill Farm | Bethlehem, CT 06751 | $39,231 |
| 59 | Est/dana S Creel | Sharon, CT 06069 | $38,995 |
| 60 | Lee Farm | Lakeville, CT 06039 | $37,853 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
