Livestock Forage Disaster Program in New London County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 35
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in New London County, Connecticut totaled $169,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Clark W Woodmansee III | Preston, CT 06365 | $16,771 |
2 | G & C Miner Farm Inc | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $11,396 |
3 | Palmer Farm | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $10,648 |
4 | Normandry Farm LLC | Griswold, CT 06351 | $9,184 |
5 | Beriah Lewis Farm Inc | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $7,695 |
6 | John Evans | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $7,642 |
7 | Terra Firma Farm LLC | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $6,526 |
8 | Steven V Snurkowski | Preston, CT 06365 | $6,511 |
9 | Brush Hill Dairy LLC | Bozrah, CT 06334 | $6,393 |
10 | Spielman Farm LLC | Baltic, CT 06330 | $6,009 |
11 | Jeffrey S Cone | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $5,865 |
12 | , | $5,832 | |
13 | White Oak Farm Inc | Stonington, CT 06378 | $5,752 |
14 | Shawn Mcgillicuddy Dba Square A Farm | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $5,722 |
15 | Duane Button Dba Buttonwould Farm | Griswold, CT 06351 | $5,567 |
16 | , | $5,352 | |
17 | Cato Corner Farm LLC | Colchester, CT 06415 | $5,187 |
18 | Sankow's Beaver Brook Farm LLC | Old Lyme, CT 06371 | $4,617 |
19 | Gary A Piszczek Hellgate Farm | Preston, CT 06365 | $4,610 |
20 | Sweet Grass Creamery LLC | Preston, CT 06365 | $4,292 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>