Total Disaster Programs in New London County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 135
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in New London County, Connecticut totaled $1,468,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Heritage Trail Vineyards Inc | Lisbon, CT 06351 | $17,881 |
22 | Joseph Majcher | Preston, CT 06365 | $16,503 |
23 | Steven V Snurkowski | Preston, CT 06365 | $15,662 |
24 | Isadore Gejdenson | Bozrah, CT 06334 | $15,595 |
25 | Groton Open Space Association Inc | Groton, CT 06340 | $15,265 |
26 | Thomas S Scott | East Lyme, CT 06333 | $14,176 |
27 | Courtland C Kinnie | Griswold, CT 06351 | $13,884 |
28 | Robert F Clauson | Hampton, CT 06247 | $13,525 |
29 | Spielman Farm | Baltic, CT 06330 | $13,036 |
30 | G & C Miner Farm Inc | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $12,749 |
31 | Warren A Strong | Bozrah, CT 06334 | $12,686 |
32 | Webster Scott | East Lyme, CT 06333 | $12,199 |
33 | Leo Wrobel | Uncasville, CT 06382 | $12,004 |
34 | Donald F Woods | Old Lyme, CT 06371 | $11,686 |
35 | Tiffany Farms | Old Lyme, CT 06371 | $11,082 |
36 | David B Lewis | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $10,776 |
37 | Richard & Edward Fleming Ptr | Preston, CT 06365 | $10,270 |
38 | Clifford Allyn Sr | Preston, CT 06365 | $10,200 |
39 | Ernest Norman | Jewett City, CT 06351 | $8,930 |
40 | Maegog Farms LLC | Salem, CT 06420 | $8,906 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”