Total Commodity Programs in New London County, Connecticut, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 61
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in New London County, Connecticut totaled $2,275,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Fishing Vessel Emily & Caitlyn LLC | Voluntown, CT 06384 | $2,132 |
42 | Deanna Arbucci | Marlborough, CT 06447 | $2,063 |
43 | Steven L Grabarek | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $1,048 |
44 | Adam Lambert | Sprague, CT 06330 | $908 |
45 | James H Northrop | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $877 |
46 | White Gate Farm | East Lyme, CT 06333 | $850 |
47 | Matthew R Williams | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $779 |
48 | Terra Firma Farm LLC | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $764 |
49 | White Oak Farm Inc | Stonington, CT 06378 | $646 |
50 | James R Allyn | Griswold, CT 06351 | $535 |
51 | Jason Aron Aubin | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $503 |
52 | Sweet Grass Creamery LLC | Preston, CT 06365 | $498 |
53 | Devon Point Land & Cattle Company | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $498 |
54 | Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation | Mashantucket, CT 06338 | $480 |
55 | Cynthia D Arons | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $448 |
56 | Christian A Swanson | Preston, CT 06365 | $422 |
57 | Susan L Davis | Norwich, CT 06360 | $221 |
58 | Blue Slope Farm Inc | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $212 |
59 | Ronald Licare Jr Amerigos Dream | Quaker Hill, CT 06375 | $206 |
60 | Isadore Gejdenson | Bozrah, CT 06334 | $148 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”