Farm Subsidy information
New London County, Connecticut
Total Subsidies in New London County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 374
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in New London County, Connecticut totaled $23,162,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Lopresti Farm - Paul & Joe Lopres | Preston, CT 06365 | $18,850 |
122 | Stone Agriculture, LLC Dba Cold Spring Farm | East Haddam, CT 06423 | $18,827 |
123 | Bilander LLC | Pawcatuck, CT 06379 | $18,640 |
124 | Hartikka Family Limited Partnership | Voluntown, CT 06384 | $18,075 |
125 | Susan L Davis | Norwich, CT 06360 | $17,897 |
126 | Heritage Trail Vineyards Inc | Lisbon, CT 06351 | $17,881 |
127 | Robert Avery | Salem, CT 06420 | $17,685 |
128 | Maugle Sierra Vineyards LLC | Ledyard, CT 06339 | $17,667 |
129 | Our Acres Farm | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $17,497 |
130 | Judith S Gadbois | Salem, CT 06420 | $17,256 |
131 | Kathryn L Chesmer | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $17,256 |
132 | Millaras Piggery LLC | Quaker Hill, CT 06375 | $17,148 |
133 | Gary Vaill | Salem, CT 06420 | $17,097 |
134 | Stephen J Plant | Pawcatuck, CT 06379 | $17,040 |
135 | Caldru, Inc | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $16,907 |
136 | Suzanne Sankow | Old Lyme, CT 06371 | $16,011 |
137 | Terra Firma Farm LLC | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $15,884 |
138 | Upper Pond Farm LLC | Lyme, CT 06371 | $15,514 |
139 | Conrad Nelson | Uncasville, CT 06382 | $15,478 |
140 | John Evans | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $15,272 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”