Farm Subsidy information
New London County, Connecticut
Total Subsidies in New London County, Connecticut, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 48
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in New London County, Connecticut totaled $567,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | A Secchiaroli & Sons Inc | Waterford, CT 06385 | $3,713 |
22 | James R Abell | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $2,677 |
23 | Sweet Grass Creamery LLC | Preston, CT 06365 | $2,207 |
24 | Edward W Fleming | Preston, CT 06365 | $1,788 |
25 | Christian A Swanson | Preston, CT 06365 | $1,460 |
26 | Blue Slope Farm Inc | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $1,457 |
27 | Louise T Randall | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $1,352 |
28 | John J Osga Jr | Griswold, CT 06351 | $1,155 |
29 | M & K's Dairy LLC | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $1,093 |
30 | Steven L Grabarek | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $785 |
31 | Terra Firma Farm LLC | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $656 |
32 | Jason Aron Aubin | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $562 |
33 | James R Allyn | Griswold, CT 06351 | $551 |
34 | Brian H Grabber Oweneco Farms | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $517 |
35 | Tiffany Farms | Old Lyme, CT 06371 | $505 |
36 | Walter G Majcher | Preston, CT 06365 | $487 |
37 | Manning Raymond & Mary | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $358 |
38 | Richard H Morgan | Ledyard, CT 06339 | $354 |
39 | George H Robinson | Stonington, CT 06378 | $289 |
40 | Frank Himmelstein | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $289 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”