Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Windham County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 68
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Windham County, Connecticut totaled $133,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Buell's Orchard | Eastford, CT 06242 | $38,352 |
2 | Woodstock Orchards LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $31,315 |
3 | Palazzi Orchards | East Killingly, CT 06243 | $12,755 |
4 | Crooke Orchard | Ashford, CT 06278 | $11,750 |
5 | John A Wolchesky | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $9,572 |
6 | Jason Klein | Sterling, CT 06377 | $6,654 |
7 | Richard K Crooke | Ashford, CT 06278 | $5,757 |
8 | Hb Buell & Sons Inc | Eastford, CT 06242 | $4,527 |
9 | Shashok Orchards LLC | Chaplin, CT 06235 | $2,251 |
10 | John Corey | Scotland, CT 06264 | $2,078 |
11 | Jean Shashok | Windham, CT 06280 | $1,525 |
12 | Assawaga Farm LLC | Putnam, CT 06260 | $1,450 |
13 | Echo Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $1,100 |
14 | Roger Daigneault | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $896 |
15 | Russo's Roots LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $500 |
16 | Blueberry Hill Organic Farm LLC | Danielson, CT 06239 | $486 |
17 | Melinda Fields Turtle Ledge Farm | Hampton, CT 06247 | $377 |
18 | Putnam Heights Orchard | Putnam, CT 06260 | $361 |
19 | Tyler Farm LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $127 |
20 | Sherman Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $127 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>