Farm Subsidy information
Windham County, Connecticut
Total Subsidies in Windham County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 305
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Windham County, Connecticut totaled $23,558,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Abbott Spring Farm Lp | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $31,596 |
82 | Margaret S Salvas Spruce Hill Farms | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $30,229 |
83 | Chris Farms LLC | Baltic, CT 06330 | $30,215 |
84 | Robert G Frink Sr | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $30,032 |
85 | Coombs Farm LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $29,622 |
86 | Ekonk Hill Turkey Farm LLC | Moosup, CT 06354 | $29,538 |
87 | Paul C Larson Sprucedale Gardens | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $28,851 |
88 | Oaklands Farm | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $28,775 |
89 | Pleasant Valley Farm | Dayville, CT 06241 | $28,340 |
90 | B-z-b Farm LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $27,852 |
91 | Quandoc Valley Farm | Danielson, CT 06239 | $27,715 |
92 | Edwin R Peck | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $27,431 |
93 | Highland Farm | Moosup, CT 06354 | $27,427 |
94 | Murdock Farm | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $27,187 |
95 | Twin Hill Farm | Scotland, CT 06264 | $25,628 |
96 | William Carver II | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $25,031 |
97 | John C Charron | Hampton, CT 06247 | $24,695 |
98 | Sherman Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $24,105 |
99 | Chestnut Hyll Farm LLC | Hampton, CT 06247 | $23,315 |
100 | Felix M Klee | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $23,234 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”