Loan Deficiency in Windham County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 104
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Windham County, Connecticut totaled $1,851,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mario Xavier | New Bedford, MA 02740 | $672 |
82 | Daniel D Syme I | Scotland, CT 06264 | $588 |
83 | Jonathan Butts | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $567 |
84 | Ernest Norman | Jewett City, CT 06351 | $456 |
85 | Ross E Eddy | North Grosvenordale, CT 06255 | $362 |
86 | Hillside Farm | Mansfield Center, CT 06250 | $361 |
87 | John Tippin | Hampton, CT 06247 | $345 |
88 | James D Carter | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $321 |
89 | William H Rose III | North Windham, CT 06256 | $276 |
90 | James K Ellsworth | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $274 |
91 | Sandy Eggers | Danielson, CT 06239 | $252 |
92 | Dianne J Davis | Central Village, CT 06332 | $251 |
93 | Lynn A Biesiadecki | Pomfret, CT 06258 | $197 |
94 | Tracy Locke-zulick & Rick Zulick | Ashford, CT 06278 | $145 |
95 | Kenneth W Hunter | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $134 |
96 | Leslie Lupien | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $118 |
97 | Charles F Franklin | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $103 |
98 | Fred R Sirrine | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $53 |
99 | Leslie Lupien | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $45 |
100 | Keri L Boucher | Scotland, CT 06264 | $36 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”