Farm Subsidy information
Windham County, Connecticut
Total Subsidies in Windham County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 305
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Windham County, Connecticut totaled $23,558,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | The Fairvue Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $1,557,153 |
2 | Fort Hill Farms LLC | Thompson, CT 06277 | $1,118,643 |
3 | Fairholm Farm Inc | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $1,101,381 |
4 | Woodhill, LLC | Hampton, CT 06247 | $1,050,103 |
5 | Valleyside Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $982,486 |
6 | Fairvue Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $941,540 |
7 | Bass Farm | Windham, CT 06280 | $802,938 |
8 | Molodich Farms Inc | Moosup, CT 06354 | $691,285 |
9 | Desjardins Farm | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $686,110 |
10 | Sherman Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $650,410 |
11 | Tyler Farm LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $647,012 |
12 | Spruce Hill Farms | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $554,551 |
13 | Elm Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $470,767 |
14 | Gluck's Dairy Farm | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $381,162 |
15 | John Ennis | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $361,624 |
16 | Norman Hill Farm | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $361,197 |
17 | Kenneth M & Suzanne R Buell Rock Maple Farm | Eastford, CT 06242 | $339,514 |
18 | Woodstock Orchards LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $315,861 |
19 | Andrew G Davis | Sterling, CT 06377 | $300,106 |
20 | Hart's Greenhouse & Florist LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $288,949 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>