Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Windham County, Connecticut, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 35
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Windham County, Connecticut totaled $140,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | The Fairvue Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $28,594 |
2 | Woodhill, LLC | Hampton, CT 06247 | $10,650 |
3 | Mitchell J Defazio | Dayville, CT 06241 | $10,032 |
4 | Bass Farm | Windham, CT 06280 | $9,500 |
5 | Fairholm Farm Inc | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $8,459 |
6 | Tyler Farm LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $7,718 |
7 | Fort Hill Farms LLC | Thompson, CT 06277 | $6,779 |
8 | Molodich Farms Inc | Moosup, CT 06354 | $6,351 |
9 | Sherman Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $6,021 |
10 | Valleyside Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $4,744 |
11 | Twin Hill Farm LLC | Scotland, CT 06264 | $4,109 |
12 | Elm Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $3,673 |
13 | Chris Farms LLC | Baltic, CT 06330 | $3,332 |
14 | Hillyland Farm Dairy LLC | Windham, CT 06280 | $2,848 |
15 | Thomas R Davis Murdock Farm | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $2,716 |
16 | Desjardins Farm | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $2,531 |
17 | Baldwin Brook Farm LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $2,510 |
18 | John Ennis | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $2,376 |
19 | Mark R Gluck | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $2,157 |
20 | Sweet's Maple LLC | Voluntown, CT 06384 | $1,984 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>