Farm Subsidy information
Windham County, Connecticut
Total Subsidies in Windham County, Connecticut, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 305
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Windham County, Connecticut totaled $23,558,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sherman Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $259,442 |
22 | Thomas R Davis Murdock Farm | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $256,524 |
23 | Coatney Hill Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $252,672 |
24 | Buell's Orchard | Eastford, CT 06242 | $246,580 |
25 | Twin Hill Farm LLC | Scotland, CT 06264 | $237,168 |
26 | Hillyland Farm | Windham, CT 06280 | $202,466 |
27 | Nancy Macglaflin | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $196,694 |
28 | Richard Coombs | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $194,450 |
29 | Creamery Brook Bison LLC | Brooklyn, CT 06234 | $189,425 |
30 | Canterbury Horticulture LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $188,546 |
31 | May Hill Farm LLC | East Woodstock, CT 06244 | $186,638 |
32 | Hibbard Hill Farm | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $178,461 |
33 | Francis Amaral | Oneco, CT 06373 | $167,844 |
34 | Ranlom Dairy Farm | Ashford, CT 06278 | $153,118 |
35 | We-li-kit Farm | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $151,462 |
36 | Thomas E Knowlton | Ashford, CT 06278 | $144,311 |
37 | Murdock Farm | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $144,269 |
38 | Russell Gray | Moosup, CT 06354 | $139,934 |
39 | David Wildowsky | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $138,555 |
40 | Gregory Peck | Ashford, CT 06278 | $129,903 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”