Total Commodity Programs in Windham County, Connecticut, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 251
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Windham County, Connecticut totaled $18,085,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $100,206 |
42 | Ox-bow Acres | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $96,957 |
43 | Mark Rzeznikiewicz | Dayville, CT 06241 | $92,184 |
44 | Ronald Jordan | Sterling, CT 06377 | $91,915 |
45 | Pinecroft Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $90,478 |
46 | Thomas B Orr | Moosup, CT 06354 | $86,439 |
47 | Robert C Peckham | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $83,179 |
48 | Woodstock Orchards LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $82,680 |
49 | Burroughs Brothers | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $75,613 |
50 | Horse Listeners Orchard LLC | Ellington, CT 06029 | $73,503 |
51 | Hull Forest Products Inc | Pomfret Center, CT 06259 | $72,234 |
52 | Willard J Stearns & Sons Inc | Storrs Mansfield, CT 06268 | $70,545 |
53 | Raydongeo Farms II | Hampton, CT 06247 | $69,242 |
54 | Elm Farm | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $68,847 |
55 | Pinecroft Farms | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $67,127 |
56 | Gluck's Dairy | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $67,063 |
57 | Coatney Hill Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $64,166 |
58 | Roland E Burroughs Jr | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $56,603 |
59 | May Hill Farm | East Woodstock, CT 06244 | $54,897 |
60 | Valley Farm | Pomfret, CT 06259 | $53,088 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”