Counter Cyclical Program in Delaware, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,201
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Delaware totaled $9,722,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Darwin A Hudson | Laurel, DE 19956 | $22,889 |
122 | Philip A Hudson | Laurel, DE 19956 | $22,889 |
123 | Chicken Little Farms Inc | Laurel, DE 19956 | $22,853 |
124 | Rustic Acres Inc | Rehoboth Beach, DE 19971 | $22,626 |
125 | Collins Acres | Millsboro, DE 19966 | $22,528 |
126 | H Ronald Webb | Greenwood, DE 19950 | $22,523 |
127 | Shawnee Wood Farms Inc | Milford, DE 19963 | $22,483 |
128 | Tri Oak Farms Inc | Bethel, DE 19931 | $22,423 |
129 | Neal Dukes | Townsend, DE 19734 | $22,358 |
130 | Darold P Adkins | Dagsboro, DE 19939 | $22,246 |
131 | Columbia Farms | Delmar, DE 19940 | $22,234 |
132 | Workman Farms | Delmar, DE 19940 | $22,186 |
133 | T A Farms LLC | Camden Wyoming, DE 19934 | $22,075 |
134 | Ronnie F Hanson | Harrington, DE 19952 | $22,010 |
135 | Elliott Farms | Delmar, DE 19940 | $21,999 |
136 | Thomas H Draper | Milton, DE 19968 | $21,940 |
137 | Willard Kauffman | Harrington, DE 19952 | $21,863 |
138 | T Gary Simendinger | Townsend, DE 19734 | $21,614 |
139 | Carol J Simendinger | Townsend, DE 19734 | $21,614 |
140 | George E Wilson Jr | Smyrna, DE 19977 | $21,501 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”