Counter Cyclical Program in Delaware, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,201
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Delaware totaled $9,722,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Carl Paul King Jr | Lincoln, DE 19960 | $16,672 |
162 | H Wallace Cook & Sons | Newark, DE 19702 | $16,664 |
163 | Rich Levels Grain Inc | Galena, MD 21635 | $16,494 |
164 | Pine Breeze Farms Inc | Bridgeville, DE 19933 | $16,406 |
165 | Daniel W Magee | Selbyville, DE 19975 | $16,381 |
166 | Smith Brothers | Milton, DE 19968 | $16,260 |
167 | Holly Hill Farms Inc | Milford, DE 19963 | $16,222 |
168 | Lost Creek Land & Cattle Company | Viola, DE 19979 | $16,185 |
169 | Vogl Brothers Partners | Harrington, DE 19952 | $16,184 |
170 | Richard Wilkins | Greenwood, DE 19950 | $16,156 |
171 | Donna L Wilkins | Greenwood, DE 19950 | $16,156 |
172 | Bruce Ryan Bartz | Denton, MD 21629 | $16,029 |
173 | Donald A Powell | Frankford, DE 19945 | $16,015 |
174 | Twin Maple Farms Inc | Greenwood, DE 19950 | $15,961 |
175 | C Wayne Hendricks | Harrington, DE 19952 | $15,953 |
176 | Addison Tatman | Bridgeville, DE 19933 | $15,882 |
177 | Fleetwood Farms Inc | Laurel, DE 19956 | $15,859 |
178 | Daniel E Bishop | Goldsboro, MD 21636 | $15,788 |
179 | Hy-point Farms | Wilmington, DE 19803 | $15,692 |
180 | J E Bailey & Sons Inc | Greenwood, DE 19950 | $15,655 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”