Farm Subsidy information
Delaware
Total Subsidies in Delaware, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,592
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Delaware totaled $484,349,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Legacy Farms | Smyrna, DE 19977 | $4,627,631 |
2 | Schiff Partnership | Alliance, NE 69301 | $3,994,183 |
3 | M J Webb Farms Inc | Greenwood, DE 19950 | $2,983,120 |
4 | Dempsey Farms LLC | Dover, DE 19901 | $2,940,614 |
5 | Wheatley Farms Inc | Bridgeville, DE 19933 | $2,770,679 |
6 | M Davis Farms LLC | Georgetown, DE 19947 | $2,525,964 |
7 | Workman's Inc | Georgetown, DE 19947 | $2,377,810 |
8 | Charles H West Farms Inc | Milford, DE 19963 | $2,374,075 |
9 | Wells Farms Inc | Milford, DE 19963 | $2,113,807 |
10 | Collins Bros Farms Inc | Millsboro, DE 19966 | $2,024,820 |
11 | Ockels Farms Inc | Milton, DE 19968 | $2,010,200 |
12 | Kruger Farms Inc | Georgetown, DE 19947 | $1,923,862 |
13 | Conaway Farms Inc | Georgetown, DE 19947 | $1,901,074 |
14 | Broad Acres Inc | Dover, DE 19901 | $1,895,847 |
15 | Parker Farms Inc | Frankford, DE 19945 | $1,884,818 |
16 | Alfred M Moor Jr | Smyrna, DE 19977 | $1,855,315 |
17 | Dulin Brothers LLC | Clayton, DE 19938 | $1,822,011 |
18 | J Carlton Wells & Sons Inc | Milton, DE 19968 | $1,817,641 |
19 | Howard E Wilkins & Sons Inc | Milford, DE 19963 | $1,763,412 |
20 | Middessa Farms David Sheat And Lloyd Sheats | Smyrna, DE 19977 | $1,712,491 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>