Farm Subsidy information
Kent County, Delaware
Total Subsidies in Kent County, Delaware, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,258
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kent County, Delaware totaled $179,571,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Schiff Partnership | Alliance, NE 69301 | $3,994,183 |
2 | Legacy Farms | Smyrna, DE 19977 | $3,781,217 |
3 | Dempsey Farms LLC | Dover, DE 19901 | $2,741,692 |
4 | Charles H West Farms Inc | Milford, DE 19963 | $2,249,382 |
5 | Broad Acres Inc | Dover, DE 19901 | $1,895,847 |
6 | Alfred M Moor Jr | Smyrna, DE 19977 | $1,855,315 |
7 | Dulin Brothers LLC | Clayton, DE 19938 | $1,776,186 |
8 | Jbs Farms Partnership | Smyrna, DE 19977 | $1,696,717 |
9 | Alfred M Moor III | Smyrna, DE 19977 | $1,687,355 |
10 | Richard A Mccloskey Sr | Felton, DE 19943 | $1,665,296 |
11 | C E Lynch & Sons Inc | Milford, DE 19963 | $1,458,986 |
12 | Emil Gallo And Sons Inc | Greenwood, DE 19950 | $1,448,449 |
13 | Fifer Orchards Inc | Camden Wyoming, DE 19934 | $1,420,465 |
14 | Barbara D Moor | Smyrna, DE 19977 | $1,367,027 |
15 | Melvin Farms Inc | Camden Wyoming, DE 19934 | $1,362,703 |
16 | F A Webb And Son | Milford, DE 19963 | $1,322,207 |
17 | Round Maple Farms | Smyrna, DE 19977 | $1,315,110 |
18 | Kyle S Webb | Frederica, DE 19946 | $1,238,325 |
19 | Sandra Cartanza T/a Shadybrook Fa | Dover, DE 19901 | $1,153,742 |
20 | Thomas H Draper | Milton, DE 19968 | $1,101,612 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>