Farm Subsidy information
Sussex County, Delaware
Total Subsidies in Sussex County, Delaware, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,090
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sussex County, Delaware totaled $242,140,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Long Branch Farms LLC | Laurel, DE 19956 | $449,434 |
102 | Fleetwood Farms Inc | Laurel, DE 19956 | $443,493 |
103 | Brad M Mcwilliams | Laurel, DE 19956 | $441,964 |
104 | Carl Paul King Jr | Lincoln, DE 19960 | $433,488 |
105 | Donald A Powell | Frankford, DE 19945 | $432,332 |
106 | George Edw Hudson | Frankford, DE 19945 | $420,020 |
107 | Howard A Webb | Milford, DE 19963 | $398,611 |
108 | C & E Farms LLC | Milton, DE 19968 | $389,042 |
109 | D Mark Adkins | Dagsboro, DE 19939 | $386,329 |
110 | Loyal J Bender | Greenwood, DE 19950 | $384,084 |
111 | Frank Clendaniel Inc | Lincoln, DE 19960 | $383,036 |
112 | Jerry K Rider | Delmar, DE 19940 | $380,348 |
113 | Chicken Little Farms Inc | Laurel, DE 19956 | $376,550 |
114 | Donald Johnson & Son Inc | Seaford, DE 19973 | $374,854 |
115 | Ray S Mears & Sons Inc | Seaford, DE 19973 | $371,606 |
116 | Rustic Acres Inc | Rehoboth Beach, DE 19971 | $368,748 |
117 | Cypress Turf Farms Inc | Laurel, DE 19956 | $365,079 |
118 | Hl & Jl Hoch Family Lp | Greenwood, DE 19950 | $356,427 |
119 | Bruce M Rickards | Dagsboro, DE 19939 | $345,787 |
120 | Morris Lee Tatman | Bridgeville, DE 19933 | $340,735 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”