Farm Subsidy information
Sussex County, Delaware
Total Subsidies in Sussex County, Delaware, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 193
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sussex County, Delaware totaled $7,489,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Shea Enterprises Inc | Greenwood, DE 19950 | $3,567 |
102 | The Dennard R Hill And Elaine F Hill Revocable Tru | Seaford, DE 19973 | $3,310 |
103 | Steven W Bailey | Laurel, DE 19956 | $3,288 |
104 | Carlisle Farms Inc | Greenwood, DE 19950 | $3,195 |
105 | Iron Mine Branch LLC | Bridgeville, DE 19933 | $3,098 |
106 | Syester Farms Inc | Harrington, DE 19952 | $3,089 |
107 | , | $3,041 | |
108 | Matthew Thomas Smith | Delmar, DE 19940 | $3,012 |
109 | Richard J Jamison Jr | Delmar, DE 19940 | $3,011 |
110 | Michael R Smith | Laurel, DE 19956 | $2,999 |
111 | Double H Farm LLC | Lewes, DE 19958 | $2,966 |
112 | Allen T Jones | Millsboro, DE 19966 | $2,888 |
113 | Wayne C Carmean | Millsboro, DE 19966 | $2,825 |
114 | Richard Watson | Milford, DE 19963 | $2,806 |
115 | Hickory Hill Farms Inc | Millsboro, DE 19966 | $2,723 |
116 | Bucks N Bills LLC | Dagsboro, DE 19939 | $2,655 |
117 | Christopher J Layfield | Phoenix, AZ 85018 | $2,606 |
118 | Del - Ridge Farms Inc | Greenwood, DE 19950 | $2,522 |
119 | John R Gundry | Seaford, DE 19973 | $2,497 |
120 | Benjamin A Cunningham | Greenwood, DE 19950 | $2,482 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”