Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Sussex County, Delaware, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 139
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Sussex County, Delaware totaled $3,247,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wells Farms Inc | Milford, DE 19963 | $221,162 |
2 | Workman's Inc | Georgetown, DE 19947 | $217,835 |
3 | Dmc Farms Inc | Laurel, DE 19956 | $172,766 |
4 | Sycamore Farm Dairy Inc | Milton, DE 19968 | $147,709 |
5 | Parker Farms Inc | Frankford, DE 19945 | $135,571 |
6 | Daisey Farms Inc | Millsboro, DE 19966 | $130,613 |
7 | Conaway Farms Inc | Georgetown, DE 19947 | $129,486 |
8 | Baxter Farms Inc | Georgetown, DE 19947 | $118,647 |
9 | Willin Farms LLC | Seaford, DE 19973 | $113,300 |
10 | J Carlton Wells & Sons Inc | Milton, DE 19968 | $103,033 |
11 | Ted Russell Farms LLC | Bridgeville, DE 19933 | $93,858 |
12 | Rj Farms Inc | Seaford, DE 19973 | $89,022 |
13 | Clear Brook Farms Inc | Bridgeville, DE 19933 | $82,047 |
14 | Redhead Farms LLC | Delmar, DE 19940 | $79,613 |
15 | Benjamin H Tull | Seaford, DE 19973 | $73,616 |
16 | Carey Farms Inc | Milford, DE 19963 | $71,133 |
17 | Fred M O'neal & Sons Inc | Seaford, DE 19973 | $69,106 |
18 | Ricland Farms LLC | Seaford, DE 19973 | $66,883 |
19 | H & V Farms Inc | Millsboro, DE 19966 | $65,886 |
20 | Donald V Collins Sr | Millsboro, DE 19966 | $52,400 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>