Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Florida, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,007
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Florida totaled $12,717,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $108,381 | |
22 | D C Cattle Inc | Eagle Lake, FL 33839 | $107,415 |
23 | Albert L Rooks Jr | Floral City, FL 34436 | $106,615 |
24 | Robert J Flint | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $101,083 |
25 | White Cattle Company LLC | Chiefland, FL 32644 | $95,047 |
26 | Jb Ranch I LLC | Immokalee, FL 34143 | $92,513 |
27 | Stokes Groves Inc | Bartow, FL 33830 | $91,554 |
28 | Nickerson Cattle Company LLC | Zolfo Springs, FL 33890 | $90,494 |
29 | D W Bass Enterprises LLC | Lakeland, FL 33809 | $84,915 |
30 | Sylvia C Mann | Winter Haven, FL 33884 | $82,233 |
31 | Rowland Cattle Company LLC | Dade City, FL 33525 | $82,166 |
32 | Lonesome G Ranch LLC | Lithia, FL 33547 | $77,635 |
33 | Bush Cattle Company LLC | Winter Haven, FL 33880 | $75,312 |
34 | Jimmy Pearce | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $74,278 |
35 | Usher Land & Timber Inc | Chiefland, FL 32644 | $72,385 |
36 | Stuart Fitzgerald | Lake Wales, FL 33859 | $69,107 |
37 | Golden A Cattle LLC | Tampa, FL 33647 | $68,768 |
38 | Peter C Rumore Jr | Plant City, FL 33565 | $68,578 |
39 | Ned Leo Waters | Bartow, FL 33831 | $66,932 |
40 | Jamie L Graham | Webster, FL 33597 | $66,327 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”