Total Commodity Programs in Florida, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 6,603
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Florida totaled $116,301,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Castleton Gardens | Homestead, FL 33031 | $179,433 |
122 | Berry Patches Inc | Dover, FL 33527 | $178,543 |
123 | Agri Starts Inc | Apopka, FL 32712 | $175,000 |
124 | Cc Landscaping Warehouse Plus Inc | Bradenton, FL 34212 | $174,979 |
125 | Williamson Cattle Co | Okeechobee, FL 34972 | $174,748 |
126 | N-n Corporation | Miami, FL 33196 | $174,606 |
127 | Quetzal Nursery, Inc | Florida City, FL 33034 | $174,536 |
128 | Suncoast Nursery & Tiki Huts Inc | Homestead, FL 33031 | $174,529 |
129 | Miami Citrus Inc | Miami, FL 33142 | $173,207 |
130 | Ethan Davis Peacock | Altha, FL 32421 | $172,099 |
131 | Angelika Foliage | Homestead, FL 33030 | $171,165 |
132 | 2x4 Ranch Real Estate Holdings LLC | Sarasota, FL 34231 | $170,887 |
133 | Johnston Brothers Farm | Bunnell, FL 32110 | $170,208 |
134 | Geronimo Farms Inc | Delray Beach, FL 33446 | $168,397 |
135 | M & J Griswold Farms | Jay, FL 32565 | $165,887 |
136 | Kimsue Foliage Inc | Palmetto Bay, FL 33157 | $165,349 |
137 | Bayside Enviromentals LLC | St Augustine, FL 32092 | $163,426 |
138 | Angkhana Chewputtanagul | Palmetto Bay, FL 33176 | $163,172 |
139 | Dimare Homestead Inc | Homestead, FL 33090 | $161,913 |
140 | Veits Dairy | Graceville, FL 32440 | $161,865 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”