Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Florida, 2022

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 184

Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Florida totaled $20,625,000 in in 2022.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP)
2022
1Oakridge Fish Hatchery Inc %davidPlant City, FL 33565$1,892,516
2Bb Parker LLC Dba Ed Parker Tropical FishSun City, FL 33586$1,843,722
3Rickie Simmons & Son Tropical FisRuskin, FL 33570$1,701,481
4Pratima Jester D/b/a Jester Bee CompanyMims, FL 32754$1,014,409
5Liles Tropical Fish IncRuskin, FL 33575$861,536
6Kevin D Jester D/b/a Jester Bee CompanyMims, FL 32754$845,341
7Humble Bee Apiary, LLCWeeki Wachee, FL 34614$536,141
8Horace BellDeland, FL 32720$514,029
9Cantu Apiaries IncZolfo Springs, FL 33890$485,372
10W Fisher Bee FarmDade City, FL 33525$462,067
11Chris M ToppingCedar Key, FL 32625$365,206
12Aquatic Collectors Of Florida IncWimauma, FL 33598$348,499
13Mv Aquatics IncPlant City, FL 33565$340,922
14Gentry Apiaries IncLoxahatchee, FL 33470$326,891
15Rawlins Tropical Fish Farm LLCLithia, FL 33547$322,260
16World Honey Market LLCSanderson, FL 32087$309,844
17Wayne Tanner Tropical Fish IncWimauma, FL 33598$303,750
18, $290,078
19Andrew Moore IncUmatilla, FL 32784$283,466
20Ledford Tropical Fish Farm IncRiverview, FL 33568$261,796

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag