Total Disaster Programs in Broward County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 213
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Broward County, Florida totaled $7,827,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Five Branches Nursery Inc | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33328 | $50,000 |
42 | Odonnell Farms | Coconut Creek, FL 33073 | $50,000 |
43 | Excel Farms Inc | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33332 | $50,000 |
44 | Marken Nursery Inc | Southwest Ranches, FL 33331 | $49,214 |
45 | , | $48,168 | |
46 | Garden Leaders Corporation | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33331 | $48,100 |
47 | Mangone & Son Nursery Inc | Coconut Creek, FL 33073 | $46,603 |
48 | Global Glades Nursery | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33332 | $46,549 |
49 | Florida Aquatic Nurseries Inc | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33325 | $43,363 |
50 | Searle Brothers Nursery Inc | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33331 | $42,362 |
51 | Glamour Industries | Hollywood, FL 33021 | $40,845 |
52 | Glamour Environmental Inc | Hollywood, FL 33021 | $39,673 |
53 | Greg Hoover | Davie, FL 33331 | $39,511 |
54 | Murray Corman | Davie, FL 33325 | $38,805 |
55 | Palms Island Nursery | Alachua, FL 32615 | $38,631 |
56 | Webb Nursery Inc | Davie, FL 33328 | $38,113 |
57 | Sherlock Hibbs | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 | $36,718 |
58 | Tindall Growers Inc | Davie, FL 33314 | $36,267 |
59 | Hoover Farms | Davie, FL 33331 | $35,137 |
60 | Romanello Tropical Nursery Inc | St Augustine, FL 32095 | $33,686 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”