Farm Subsidy information
Collier County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Collier County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 214
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Collier County, Florida totaled $158,680,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dottavio Florida Farms LLC | Minotola, NJ 08341 | $2,260,762 |
2 | Eddy Foods, LLC | Naples, FL 34117 | $2,221,311 |
3 | Tko Farms LLC | Naples, FL 34109 | $1,506,876 |
4 | Ark Foods Group, Inc. | Brooklyn, NY 11215 | $1,500,000 |
5 | Pacific Tomato Growers Ltd | Palmetto, FL 34221 | $1,469,340 |
6 | , | $1,363,702 | |
7 | American Farms LLC | Naples, FL 34117 | $1,302,857 |
8 | Huapilla Produce Inc. | Immokalee, FL 34143 | $1,265,484 |
9 | , | $1,225,726 | |
10 | Troyer Brothers Florida Inc | Immokalee, FL 34143 | $1,200,749 |
11 | Barron Collier Partnership Lllp | Naples, FL 34105 | $1,068,154 |
12 | Ld Harvesting Inc. | Immokalee, FL 34142 | $1,051,710 |
13 | Bwj Farms Inc | Immokalee, FL 34143 | $1,026,445 |
14 | Oakes Farm Op LLC | Immokalee, FL 34142 | $1,002,000 |
15 | Veneziano Farms LLC | Estero, FL 33928 | $1,000,000 |
16 | Rojo Farms LLC | Immokalee, FL 34142 | $981,867 |
17 | Star S Farm & Produce, LLC | Immokalee, FL 34143 | $903,268 |
18 | Topiary Creations Inc | Naples, FL 34117 | $838,580 |
19 | Organic General Store LLC | Naples, FL 34102 | $764,150 |
20 | Oakes Farm Inc. | Naples, FL 34109 | $738,582 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>