Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Columbia County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 252
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Columbia County, Florida totaled $1,216,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Clinton Dicks Jr | Lake City, FL 32025 | $12,659 |
22 | N Terry Dicks | Lake City, FL 32025 | $12,659 |
23 | Dwight Pettyjohn | Lake City, FL 32025 | $12,634 |
24 | Roger Davis | Lake City, FL 32025 | $12,392 |
25 | Emory Bailey | Lake City, FL 32025 | $12,124 |
26 | Roosevelt Dicks | Lake City, FL 32024 | $11,145 |
27 | Bill Pettyjohn | Lake City, FL 32025 | $10,426 |
28 | Richard B Philpot | Lake City, FL 32024 | $10,307 |
29 | Farrell Feagle | Lake City, FL 32025 | $10,215 |
30 | Kenneth Witt | Lake City, FL 32025 | $10,158 |
31 | James Hunter Ketcham | Lake City, FL 32024 | $9,718 |
32 | Rickey W Smith | Lake City, FL 32024 | $9,680 |
33 | Harvey Faul | Lake City, FL 32024 | $8,880 |
34 | Charlotte Markham | Lake City, FL 32024 | $8,811 |
35 | A B Markham | Lake City, FL 32024 | $8,655 |
36 | Nevin W Graham | Lake City, FL 32025 | $8,344 |
37 | Elizabeth H Thomas | Lake City, FL 32055 | $8,033 |
38 | Donald B Spradley | Lake City, FL 32055 | $7,978 |
39 | Rufus C Ogden Jr | Lake City, FL 32055 | $7,710 |
40 | Rufus Ogden | Lake City, FL 32025 | $7,668 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”