Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Columbia County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 82
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Columbia County, Florida totaled $197,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mark Kirby | Lake City, FL 32025 | $1,085 |
62 | Janice I Tompkins | Lake City, FL 32025 | $1,014 |
63 | Cheryl Murrin | Lake City, FL 32025 | $1,014 |
64 | Duane E Dopler | Lake City, FL 32025 | $998 |
65 | Doyle Ottinger | Lake City, FL 32025 | $896 |
66 | Philip Parnell | Jacksonville, FL 32258 | $858 |
67 | Ora Terry | Fort White, FL 32038 | $856 |
68 | Halbert Wood | Lake City, FL 32025 | $793 |
69 | Everett Hicks | Lake City, FL 32024 | $784 |
70 | J L Dicks | Lake City, FL 32025 | $780 |
71 | Annie T Dicks | Lake City, FL 32024 | $780 |
72 | John L Goedert | Saint Augustine, FL 32084 | $780 |
73 | Daisy Bell Watson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $702 |
74 | Isiah Parnell | High Springs, FL 32655 | $656 |
75 | Katherine Hewett | Fort White, FL 32038 | $495 |
76 | David P Porter | Fort White, FL 32038 | $482 |
77 | Richard Dale Parrish | Lake City, FL 32055 | $405 |
78 | Aline E Kolek | Lake City, FL 32025 | $390 |
79 | Wanda L Alexander | North Charleston, SC 29405 | $390 |
80 | Mary E Stanford | Lake City, FL 32056 | $375 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”