Total Disaster Programs in Columbia County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 447
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Columbia County, Florida totaled $12,723,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Ronald A Feagle Jr | Lake City, FL 32025 | $21,701 |
102 | Richard Keen | Lake City, FL 32024 | $21,315 |
103 | Jonathan Akins | Lake City, FL 32025 | $20,751 |
104 | Christopher D English | Fort White, FL 32038 | $20,408 |
105 | Simon Watson Sr | Fort White, FL 32038 | $19,956 |
106 | Nevin W Graham | Lake City, FL 32025 | $19,134 |
107 | Gary Meeks | Lake City, FL 32024 | $19,072 |
108 | Henry D Tyre | Lake City, FL 32025 | $18,974 |
109 | C & V Custom Ag Service Inc | High Springs, FL 32643 | $18,853 |
110 | Byron E Duce | Lake City, FL 32025 | $18,680 |
111 | Farrell Feagle | Lake City, FL 32025 | $18,631 |
112 | Nathaniel Watson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $18,008 |
113 | Emory Bailey | Lake City, FL 32025 | $17,899 |
114 | W L Lang Jr | Lake City, FL 32024 | $17,691 |
115 | A B Markham | Lake City, FL 32024 | $17,670 |
116 | Edward D Roberts | O Brien, FL 32071 | $17,609 |
117 | Paul Dallas Mattox | Lake City, FL 32025 | $17,556 |
118 | David W Feagle | Lake City, FL 32024 | $17,414 |
119 | George Brady III | Fort White, FL 32038 | $17,112 |
120 | Everett Hicks | Lake City, FL 32024 | $17,108 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”