Emergency Conservation Program in Columbia County, Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 32
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Columbia County, Florida totaled $223,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wayne Moseley | Lake City, FL 32024 | $39,295 |
| 2 | Delvey Dicks | Lake City, FL 32025 | $18,361 |
| 3 | Arnold J Hill | Lake City, FL 32025 | $17,197 |
| 4 | Kenneth O Dicks Farms Inc | Lake City, FL 32025 | $12,855 |
| 5 | Bar D Ranch | Lake City, FL 32025 | $12,662 |
| 6 | Rodney S Dicks | Lake City, FL 32025 | $12,415 |
| 7 | Donald W Graham | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $8,864 |
| 8 | Michael Roberts | Lake City, FL 32024 | $8,745 |
| 9 | Edward Dicks | Lake City, FL 32025 | $8,468 |
| 10 | Inge Moseley | Lake City, FL 32024 | $7,375 |
| 11 | Aubrey Bailey | Lake City, FL 32024 | $6,868 |
| 12 | J W Moseley Joint Venture | Lake City, FL 32024 | $6,368 |
| 13 | Jeff Willis LLC | Lake City, FL 32056 | $6,155 |
| 14 | David W Feagle | Lake City, FL 32024 | $5,949 |
| 15 | Regal Dicks | Lake City, FL 32025 | $4,919 |
| 16 | James Donald Adams | Lake City, FL 32025 | $4,895 |
| 17 | Loretta Pearce | Lake City, FL 32024 | $4,719 |
| 18 | Overkill Hill Farms LLC | Fort White, FL 32038 | $4,314 |
| 19 | Leslie L Williams | Lake City, FL 32024 | $4,288 |
| 20 | Wendell C Bailey | Lake City, FL 32024 | $3,960 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf