Peanut Quota Buyout Program in Columbia County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 36
Recipients of Peanut Quota Buyout Program from farms in Columbia County, Florida totaled $727,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Peanut Quota Buyout Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wayne Moseley | Lake City, FL 32024 | $291,180 |
2 | I C Terry Farms Inc | Lake City, FL 32024 | $82,165 |
3 | Robert L Moseley Jr | Old Town, FL 32680 | $62,625 |
4 | R Lamar Moseley | Fort White, FL 32038 | $55,570 |
5 | George C Moseley | Lake City, FL 32024 | $46,435 |
6 | Simon Watson Sr Estate | Fort White, FL 32038 | $24,800 |
7 | Russell Wilson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $23,500 |
8 | Bessie Nell Wilson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $22,570 |
9 | Nathaniel Watson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $17,105 |
10 | Daisy Lee Cason | Fort White, FL 32038 | $16,270 |
11 | Hennie M Lites | Fort White, FL 32038 | $12,405 |
12 | Chester A Patterson | High Springs, FL 32643 | $10,415 |
13 | Naomi Watson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $9,010 |
14 | W A Saunders Jr | White Springs, FL 32096 | $8,630 |
15 | Hazel Watson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $8,565 |
16 | Clarence Watson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $8,565 |
17 | Letha Dennis | Fort White, FL 32038 | $8,505 |
18 | Mary Guynn | Fort White, FL 32038 | $6,920 |
19 | Garry Lites | Fort White, FL 32038 | $4,955 |
20 | Daisy Bell Watson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $2,485 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>