Farm Subsidy information
Columbia County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Columbia County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 894
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Columbia County, Florida totaled $40,619,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | North Florida Timber Dealers Inc | Lake City, FL 32056 | $208,095 |
42 | David W Feagle | Lake City, FL 32024 | $187,937 |
43 | Timothy L Bussey | Fort White, FL 32038 | $184,995 |
44 | Ryan Marlin Feagle | Lake City, FL 32025 | $174,134 |
45 | George C Moseley | Lake City, FL 32024 | $170,755 |
46 | Sherod Keen | Lake City, FL 32025 | $165,743 |
47 | T & W Inc | Fort White, FL 32038 | $163,640 |
48 | Rickey W Smith | Lake City, FL 32024 | $162,382 |
49 | Roger Davis | Lake City, FL 32025 | $161,556 |
50 | James H Ketcham-4k Cattle Co LLC | Lake City, FL 32024 | $154,898 |
51 | Drew Wayne Dicks | Lake City, FL 32024 | $153,484 |
52 | Nathaniel Watson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $151,981 |
53 | Wendell C Bailey | Lake City, FL 32024 | $147,539 |
54 | Harry Moseley | Lake City, FL 32056 | $144,542 |
55 | Bill Pettyjohn | Lake City, FL 32025 | $142,432 |
56 | Ameris Bank ** | Dothan, AL 36303 | $139,282 |
57 | Kelly J Philman | Bell, FL 32619 | $134,790 |
58 | Billy Cason | Fort White, FL 32038 | $134,649 |
59 | Hal Boyette | Lake City, FL 32024 | $131,829 |
60 | Daisy Bell Watson | Fort White, FL 32038 | $129,356 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”