Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Dade County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 529
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Dade County, Florida totaled $18,289,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Bairo Erreguin | Homestead, FL 33034 | $71,701 |
82 | John Derek Eaker | Homestead, FL 33033 | $71,097 |
83 | Johnny Eaker | Homestead, FL 33031 | $71,077 |
84 | Steven Eaker | Goulds, FL 33170 | $71,077 |
85 | L & L Produce Inc | Miami, FL 33144 | $70,895 |
86 | Vine Ripe Tomato And Produce | Homestead, FL 33034 | $69,362 |
87 | Lnb Groves Inc | Homestead, FL 33031 | $68,647 |
88 | Tahira Anwar Enterprises Inc | Plantation, FL 33313 | $68,498 |
89 | Triple D Farms Inc | Homestead, FL 33033 | $68,226 |
90 | Dirnberger Farms Inc | Homestead, FL 33030 | $66,531 |
91 | Bruce Perra | Homestead, FL 33030 | $66,112 |
92 | Peter Pith | Homestead, FL 33030 | $65,202 |
93 | Sergio F Perez | Miami, FL 33187 | $62,810 |
94 | Coalition Of Fl Farmworker | Florida City, FL 33034 | $61,028 |
95 | Edward Castleberry | Homestead, FL 33034 | $58,174 |
96 | La Fe Nursery & Landscaping, Inc. | Miami, FL 33196 | $57,985 |
97 | Robert K Ames | Homestead, FL 33031 | $56,653 |
98 | Noel Arauz | Florida City, FL 33034 | $55,516 |
99 | Joel Echevarria | Miami, FL 33177 | $55,003 |
100 | La Cuba Corporation | Miami, FL 33183 | $54,002 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”