Farm Subsidy information
Dade County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Dade County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 3,472
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dade County, Florida totaled $311,033,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Vila And Son Tree Farm Inc | Miami, FL 33170 | $380,028 |
182 | Lugo & Lugo Inc/dba P & P Nursery | Homestead, FL 33031 | $379,523 |
183 | Jaimes Nursery Inc | Homestead, FL 33031 | $378,210 |
184 | Green Leaf Nursery Inc | Homestead, FL 33030 | $375,135 |
185 | Sunshine Groves Inc | Homestead, FL 33030 | $370,992 |
186 | Just Big Stuff Nursery Inc | Miami, FL 33177 | $364,753 |
187 | Nicolas Vega | Miami, FL 33177 | $364,386 |
188 | Tjm Farms LLC | Homestead, FL 33034 | $361,922 |
189 | Atb Trading Inc | Homestead, FL 33031 | $356,340 |
190 | Jolo Farms Inc | Coral Gables, FL 33158 | $355,406 |
191 | Guilarte Bros Farms Co | Miami, FL 33187 | $355,078 |
192 | Guanachapi Nursery Inc | Miami, FL 33196 | $354,130 |
193 | Dimare Homestead Inc | Homestead, FL 33090 | $353,743 |
194 | Jose N Milanes | Miramar, FL 33027 | $352,108 |
195 | Julio R Serrano | Miami, FL 33196 | $351,822 |
196 | Florida Tropiculture Inc | Miami, FL 33197 | $351,536 |
197 | Manny Farms Corp | Miami, FL 33166 | $345,706 |
198 | L & L Produce Inc | Miami, FL 33144 | $344,562 |
199 | Supreme Foliage Inc | Miami, FL 33186 | $344,203 |
200 | Jesus Valladares | Miami, FL 33155 | $343,979 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”