Specialty Crop Hurricane Disaster Program in Dade County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 348
Recipients of Specialty Crop Hurricane Disaster Program from farms in Dade County, Florida totaled $7,564,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Specialty Crop Hurricane Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Costa Nursery Farms Inc | Goulds, FL 33170 | $156,625 |
2 | Caribbean Tree Farms Inc | Homestead, FL 33090 | $137,125 |
3 | Tropical Farms | Princeton, FL 33032 | $133,200 |
4 | Melrose Nursery Inc | Homestead, FL 33032 | $128,625 |
5 | Green Depot Corporation | Miami, FL 33156 | $99,713 |
6 | Ledford Farms Inc | Homestead, FL 33030 | $97,845 |
7 | Exotic Botanical Inc | Miami, FL 33170 | $97,000 |
8 | Panamenian Palms Inc | Astoria, NY 11102 | $90,011 |
9 | Diaz Family Nsy Inc | Miami, FL 33187 | $87,956 |
10 | Princeton Nurseries Inc | Homestead, FL 33092 | $87,790 |
11 | Bill's Nursery Inc | Homestead, FL 33030 | $87,275 |
12 | Shiva Shakti Inc | Homestead, FL 33030 | $86,726 |
13 | Sylvan Nursery Farm LLC | Miami, FL 33170 | $85,958 |
14 | Ramon's Nursery Inc | Miami, FL 33185 | $85,938 |
15 | Acosta Farms Inc | Miami, FL 33197 | $85,150 |
16 | Holiday Landscaping Inc | Miami, FL 33187 | $85,000 |
17 | Miguel Guillen | Hialeah, FL 33010 | $84,825 |
18 | San Miguel Nsy Corp | Homestead, FL 33031 | $84,489 |
19 | Nursery Brokerage Inc | Hollywood, FL 33020 | $84,346 |
20 | Golden Tree Farms | Florida City, FL 33034 | $83,425 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>