Farm Subsidy information
Dade County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Dade County, Florida, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 343
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dade County, Florida totaled $29,565,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | United Industries Services Inc | Miami, FL 33187 | $323,155 |
22 | Mayra Nursery Inc | Florida City, FL 33034 | $286,972 |
23 | Marquez Farms LLC | Homestead, FL 33031 | $273,484 |
24 | B & C Tropicals Inc | Homestead, FL 33031 | $269,423 |
25 | Sandoval Farms, Inc | Florida City, FL 33034 | $259,874 |
26 | Morningside Garden Inc | Princeton, FL 33032 | $252,091 |
27 | Capri Farms Inc | Homestead, FL 33031 | $247,300 |
28 | Plant Solutions Inc. | Homestead, FL 33031 | $245,898 |
29 | Swash Farm Inc | Homestead, FL 33034 | $236,826 |
30 | Eugenio J Collazo | Goulds, FL 33170 | $236,476 |
31 | Andersen Nursery Farm | Homestead, FL 33031 | $226,279 |
32 | Plant Life Farms LLC | Miami, FL 33146 | $225,000 |
33 | Railroad Nursery Inc | Homestead, FL 33031 | $223,985 |
34 | Keith St Germain | Homestead, FL 33031 | $220,474 |
35 | Roly & Sons Inc | Miami, FL 33186 | $218,916 |
36 | Farm Life Tropical Foliage Of Hom | Tavernier, FL 33070 | $211,599 |
37 | Ismel Vera | Miami, FL 33187 | $211,021 |
38 | Bick Tropical Farms Inc | Homestead, FL 33090 | $210,926 |
39 | Arziki Nursery, LLC | Homestead, FL 33033 | $209,299 |
40 | Castleton Gardens | Homestead, FL 33031 | $200,380 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”