Farm Subsidy information
DeSoto County, Florida
Total Subsidies in DeSoto County, Florida, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 141
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in DeSoto County, Florida totaled $15,261,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lou Hoopingarner | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $47,163 |
22 | Albritton Groves Ltd | Sarasota, FL 34233 | $36,618 |
23 | Juan Uriburu | Miami, FL 33149 | $35,419 |
24 | Crs Cattle Company LLC | Zolfo Springs, FL 33890 | $35,345 |
25 | C W Harrison Inc | Arcadia, FL 34265 | $30,098 |
26 | Citra Lee LLC | Wauchula, FL 33873 | $28,656 |
27 | Eugene H. Turner, III,llc | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $27,469 |
28 | Vch Ranch-fl LLC | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $26,796 |
29 | Charles W Harrison Sr Estate | Arcadia, FL 34265 | $26,351 |
30 | Mjw Ranch LLC | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $25,605 |
31 | Robert J Flint | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $23,970 |
32 | James D. Brewer And E Coleman Brewer | Nocatee, FL 34268 | $22,915 |
33 | Ranch Management LLC | Sarasota, FL 34231 | $22,605 |
34 | John R Dees | Arcadia, FL 34265 | $18,683 |
35 | Philip W Turner Family Prtn | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $18,576 |
36 | E & I Family LLC | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $15,264 |
37 | Arcadia Groves | Wauchula, FL 33873 | $13,806 |
38 | H & M Citrus LLC | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $13,317 |
39 | Hudson Ranch LLC | Fort Ogden, FL 34267 | $13,228 |
40 | Darrell Williamson | Arcadia, FL 34265 | $12,540 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”