Production Flexibility Program in Escambia County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 238
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Escambia County, Florida totaled $6,686,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Larry E Smith | Surprise, AZ 85374 | $101,404 |
22 | John Loewen | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $100,657 |
23 | Roy J Classen | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $91,729 |
24 | Gale D Unruh | Fountain Run, KY 42133 | $90,948 |
25 | Gregory Eicher | Fountain Run, KY 42133 | $88,014 |
26 | Marilyn S Ward | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $86,992 |
27 | B Glen Wiggins Jr | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $85,185 |
28 | Melvin Hiebert | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $84,790 |
29 | Charles W Solari Jr | Molino, FL 32577 | $80,018 |
30 | Robert Earl Godwin | Century, FL 32535 | $79,905 |
31 | Patricia Elaine Godwin | Century, FL 32535 | $79,905 |
32 | Pineville Farms LLC | Jay, FL 32565 | $75,492 |
33 | Carl G Wenger And Deola A Wenger Rev Joint Tr | Hesston, KS 67062 | $75,442 |
34 | John Michael Koehn | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $74,832 |
35 | Wallace Eicher | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $72,339 |
36 | John B Wenger | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $71,874 |
37 | Michael G Godwin | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $70,147 |
38 | J Maynard Koehn | Century, FL 32535 | $63,056 |
39 | George W Eubanks Jr | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $61,960 |
40 | Chad Nickel | Walnut Hill, FL 32568 | $61,734 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”