Farm Subsidy information
Glades County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Glades County, Florida, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 126
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Glades County, Florida totaled $7,947,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | L N L Cattle Co | Lake Placid, FL 33852 | $55,125 |
22 | Universal Tree Farm LLC | West Palm Beach, FL 33412 | $53,592 |
23 | Robert B Oxer Jr | Venus, FL 33960 | $52,601 |
24 | Frank Robert Dana | Labelle, FL 33935 | $51,865 |
25 | Boma LLC | Orlando, FL 32801 | $51,689 |
26 | R6 Cattle LLC | Lake Placid, FL 33852 | $50,675 |
27 | Lazy H Land & Cattle Inc | Odessa, FL 33556 | $50,591 |
28 | Tuyl Oxer | Venus, FL 33960 | $45,239 |
29 | Pearce Ranch Inc | Okeechobee, FL 34973 | $43,918 |
30 | Fitz Hugh Williams III | Okeechobee, FL 34973 | $43,892 |
31 | C 2 Ranch Inc | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $41,715 |
32 | Indian Prairie Cattle Co Inc | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $40,062 |
33 | Gillie C Russell | Lake Placid, FL 33862 | $37,431 |
34 | Hood Citrus Caretaking Inc | Labelle, FL 33935 | $37,084 |
35 | Lazy Jp Inc | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $37,035 |
36 | Richard W Beck | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $36,634 |
37 | Thomas N Toms II | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $32,791 |
38 | Greg Collier | Alva, FL 33920 | $32,283 |
39 | C & S Citrus Service Inc | Lake Placid, FL 33852 | $31,305 |
40 | J. R. Kilpatrick, LLC | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $31,031 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”