Farm Subsidy information
Glades County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Glades County, Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 369
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Glades County, Florida totaled $51,520,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Caloosa Groves LLC | Parrish, FL 34219 | $192,343 |
42 | Roadrunner Citrus | Tucson, AZ 85737 | $181,978 |
43 | Boma LLC | Orlando, FL 32801 | $176,689 |
44 | Daniels & Son Inc | Labelle, FL 33975 | $175,608 |
45 | Watermelon Express LLC | Higganum, CT 06441 | $169,956 |
46 | Lazy H Land & Cattle Inc | Odessa, FL 33556 | $158,115 |
47 | Stanlo Johns | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $157,799 |
48 | Donald Peeples | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $156,246 |
49 | Frierson Farm Inc | Clewiston, FL 33440 | $155,086 |
50 | Cutshall Ventures LLC | Fort Denaud, FL 33935 | $148,385 |
51 | John Tiedtke | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $132,468 |
52 | R6 Cattle LLC | Lake Placid, FL 33852 | $131,426 |
53 | C 2 Ranch Inc | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $128,792 |
54 | Palm & Sod LLC | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $123,284 |
55 | Perry Farm | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $121,185 |
56 | R D Lundy Jr | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $121,042 |
57 | Indian Prairie Cattle Co Inc | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $115,986 |
58 | R Matt Pearce | Okeechobee, FL 34972 | $112,418 |
59 | Kerman Corp | Clewiston, FL 33440 | $111,843 |
60 | Glades Ag Corp | Miami, FL 33130 | $109,684 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”