Farm Subsidy information
Gulf County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Gulf County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 79
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gulf County, Florida totaled $3,235,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James E Rish | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $4,229 |
42 | Harry Herrington | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $3,694 |
43 | Lynda G Shealy | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $3,497 |
44 | Jim J Austin | Bascom, FL 32423 | $3,367 |
45 | Leo G Shealy Jr | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $3,044 |
46 | Colby Gay | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $2,866 |
47 | W C Batson | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $2,630 |
48 | Gene Raffield | Port Saint Joe, FL 32457 | $2,565 |
49 | William J Rish Estate | Port St Joe, FL 32457 | $2,451 |
50 | Ike P Mincy | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $2,437 |
51 | Haywood Borders | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $2,349 |
52 | Robert C Rish | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $2,249 |
53 | Richard Whitten | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $2,218 |
54 | William Setterich | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $2,134 |
55 | Smith Creek Apiaries LLC | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $2,133 |
56 | Dewey Nunnery | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $2,024 |
57 | William L Nunery | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $2,024 |
58 | Deborah Davis | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $1,908 |
59 | Hughey Williams Sr | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $1,748 |
60 | Cary Floore | Wewahitchka, FL 32465 | $1,697 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”