Emergency Conservation Program in Hillsborough County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 103
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Hillsborough County, Florida totaled $1,314,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Emerald Hill Nursery Inc | Plant City, FL 33565 | $7,582 |
42 | G & G Farms LLC | Plant City, FL 33564 | $7,520 |
43 | Edgar Lariscy | Dover, FL 33527 | $7,260 |
44 | Everett F Prevatt | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $7,040 |
45 | Christophe W Sizemore | Dover, FL 33527 | $7,040 |
46 | Favorite Farms Inc | Dover, FL 33527 | $6,803 |
47 | Frederick Mcisaac | Plant City, FL 33567 | $6,050 |
48 | Tom J Haney | Plant City, FL 33565 | $5,896 |
49 | Palms Of Plant City Inc | Plant City, FL 33566 | $5,592 |
50 | Ervin Johnson | Plant City, FL 33567 | $5,440 |
51 | Berkshire Investments | Watsonville, CA 95076 | $5,248 |
52 | Ellis Groves Inc | Plant City, FL 33565 | $4,834 |
53 | Ronald C Hartley | Lithia, FL 33547 | $4,563 |
54 | Clayton T Cox | Thonotosassa, FL 33592 | $4,457 |
55 | John M Raburn | Plant City, FL 33565 | $4,427 |
56 | Bruce E White | Durant, FL 33530 | $4,415 |
57 | S Mcdonald Farms Inc | Plant City, FL 33565 | $4,380 |
58 | Aaron Scott Drake | Plant City, FL 33563 | $4,296 |
59 | E&v Cattle Company LLC | Seffner, FL 33584 | $4,190 |
60 | Brackins & Company Inc. | Tampa, FL 33679 | $4,021 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”