Farm Subsidy information
Hillsborough County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Hillsborough County, Florida, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 170
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hillsborough County, Florida totaled $5,802,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Blackwater Creek Ranch Inc | Kathleen, FL 33849 | $7,181 |
42 | Golden A Cattle LLC | Tampa, FL 33647 | $7,040 |
43 | Passion Organics LLC | Thonotosassa, FL 33592 | $6,997 |
44 | Golden Pond Tropicals Inc | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $6,734 |
45 | Rocking V Ranch LLC | Plant City, FL 33565 | $6,068 |
46 | Henry C Badcock | Mulberry, FL 33860 | $5,171 |
47 | Christian J Ramthun Inc | Tampa, FL 33606 | $5,156 |
48 | Cb Club Calves LLC | Plant City, FL 33563 | $4,884 |
49 | Roland Lancaster | Plant City, FL 33563 | $4,643 |
50 | Ryan Raburn | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $4,384 |
51 | Ellis Groves Inc | Plant City, FL 33565 | $4,304 |
52 | Travis Scott Hardy | Lithia, FL 33547 | $4,116 |
53 | Benjamin A May | Duette, FL 34219 | $4,096 |
54 | Central Florida Agricultural Operations LLC | Plant City, FL 33565 | $3,940 |
55 | Russo Brothers Cattle Company LLC | Tampa, FL 33625 | $3,905 |
56 | Mcquaig Farms LLC | Plant City, FL 33567 | $3,452 |
57 | Sweet Blossom Cattle Company LLC | Ruskin, FL 33570 | $3,441 |
58 | B & B Land And Cattle LLC | Balm, FL 33503 | $3,356 |
59 | Esms Enterprises Ltd | Tampa, FL 33618 | $3,316 |
60 | David L Coleman | Lithia, FL 33547 | $3,226 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”